|
Griechische Waffentechnologie: Kriegsschiffe Part 2 The Crew
These numbers are an estimation (some other sources say 170 rowers), for example an old Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities , eds. William Smith, LLD, William Wayte, G. E. Marindin provides as a crew 17 sailors, 1 trierarch, 2 toicharchoi, 1 keleustes , 1 trieraules, 1 eschareus and 10 epibatae (Their number dependends on the mission) Other specialists
Pay for the rowers was 1 drachma a day (increased in 415 BC). Before it was 2 oboloi but at war time it was more. Athens undertook many small military expeditions just to keep the oarsmen fit, although as far as skill was concerned "the majority can row as soon as they get aboard since they have practised all through their life" (The "Old Oligarch"). In 431 BC, the service of 200 triremes for six months cost 800 talents or 4.8 million drachmae. In 483-410 BC Athens commissioned 1,500 triremes at a cost of 15,000 talents or 90 million drachmae. , in his comedy play The Frogs, refers to the common habit of the upper banks of oarsmen "farting in the face of the thalamite." PERSEUS Prow of Trireme. (From Greek terra-cotta vase in British Museum.) Xenophon Anabasis It is a long day's journey for a trireme to row from Byzantium to Heracleia Aristotle, Metaphysics , logic and triremes Again, if all contradictory predications of the same subject at the same time are true, clearly all things will be one. For if it is equally possible either to affirm or deny anything of anything, the same thing will be a trireme and a wall and a man; which is what necessarily follows for those who hold the theory of Protagoras. For if anyone thinks that a man is not a trireme, he is clearly not a trireme; and so he also is a trireme if the contradictory statement is true and the result is the dictum of Anaxagoras, "all things mixed together" ; so that nothing truly exists. It seems, then, that they are speaking of the Indeterminate; and while they think that they are speaking of what exists, they are really speaking of what does not; for the Indeterminate is that which exists potentially but not actually.But indeed they must admit the affirmation or negation of any predicate of any subject, for it is absurd that in the case of each term its own negation should be true, and the negation of some other term which is not true of it should not be true. I mean, e.g., that if it is true to say that a man is not a man, it is obviously also true to say that he is or is not a trireme.Then if the affirmation is true, so must the negation be true; but if the affirmation is not true the negation will be even truer than the negation of the original term itself Images
|